Prepotent response inhibition and interference control in autism spectrum disorders: two meta-analyses

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2014
Journal Autism Research
Volume | Issue number 7 | 4
Pages (from-to) 407-420
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract

Search String

Advanced >
Saved Searches >

ARTICLE TOOLS

Get PDF (432K)
Save to My Profile
E-mail Link to this Article
Export Citation for this Article
Get Citation Alerts
Request Permissions

More Sharing ServicesShare|Share on citeulikeShare on facebookShare on deliciousShare on www.mendeley.comShare on twitter

Abstract
Article
References
Cited By

View Full Article (HTML) Enhanced Article (HTML) Get PDF (432K)

UvA-linker Full Text

Keywords:

ASD;
autism;
inhibition;
interference;
cognitive control;
meta-analysis

There is a substantial amount of data providing evidence for, but also against the hypothesis that individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) encounter inhibitory control deficits. ASD is often associated with interference control deficits rather than prepotent response inhibition. Moreover, the developmental trajectory for these inhibitory control processes is hypothesized to differ in ASD as compared to typical development. In efforts to gain a more comprehensive perspective of inhibition in ASD, separate quantitative analysis for prepotent response inhibition studies and interference control studies were conducted. Together, these two meta-analyses included 41 studies with a combined sample size of 1,091 people with ASD (M age 14.8 years), and 1,306 typically developing (TD) controls (M age 13.8 years).The meta-analyses indicated that individuals with ASD show increased difficulties in prepotent response inhibition (effect size 0.55) and in interference control (effect size 0.31). In addition, age was a relevant moderator for prepotent response inhibition but not for interference control. Exploratory analyses revealed that when IQ was taken into account, heterogeneity considerably decreased among interference control studies but not among prepotent response inhibition. In contrast to the general belief, both prepotent response inhibition and interference control problems were observed in individuals with ASD. However, a large variation between studies was also found. Therefore, there remain factors beyond inhibition type, age, or IQ that significantly influence inhibitory control performance among individuals with ASD.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1369
Downloads
442052 (Submitted manuscript)
Permalink to this page
Back