Studio Monitori and Others v. Georgia: access to public documents must be ‘instrumental’ for the right to freedom of expression
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 23-03-2020 |
| Publisher | Strasbourg Observers |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
In the case of Studio Monitori and Others v. Georgia
the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in its judgment of 30
January 2020 has confirmed that the right to freedom of expression and
information as guaranteed by Article 10 of the European Convention on
Human Rights (ECHR) can only be invoked in order to obtain access to
public documents when a set of conditions are fulfilled. It is one of
the cases following the judgment of the Grand Chamber in Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary
to test the scope and limits of the right of access to information and
the applicability of Article 10 ECHR. The most important consequence of
the judgment in Studio Monitori and Others is that NGOs,
journalists or other public watchdogs requesting access to public
documents have to motivate and clarify in their request that access to
the documents they are applying for is instrumental, and even necessary,
for their journalistic reporting and that the requested documents
contain information of public interest.
|
| Document type | Web publication or website |
| Language | English |
| Related publication | Refusal to give access to ‘confidential’ information about politicians violated NGO’s Article 10 rights |
| Published at | https://strasbourgobservers.com/2020/03/23/studio-monitori-and-others-v-georgia-access-to-public-documents-must-be-instrumental-for-the-right-to-freedom-of-expression/ |
| Downloads |
Studio Monitori and Others
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
