Effects of EU illegal logging policy on timber-supplying countries A systematic review

Open Access
Authors
  • F.D. Polo Villanueva
  • Y.T. Tegegne
  • G. Winkel
  • P.O. Cerutti
  • S. Ramcilovic-Suominen
  • C.L. McDermott
  • J. Zeitlin
  • M. Sotirov
  • B. Cashore
  • D.A. Wardell
  • A. Haywood
  • L. Giessen
Publication date 01-02-2023
Journal Journal of Environmental Management
Article number 116874
Volume | Issue number 327
Number of pages 10
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
Abstract

The EU's Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade Action Plan (FLEGT) adopted in 2003 includes bilateral trade agreements known as Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPAs) signed between the EU and timber-supplying countries. The EU has invested more than 1.5 billion euros in VPAs; however, only one of the seven concerned countries has managed to complete all the necessary requirements to expire FLEGT licences. Since there is no research that comprehensively integrates the scientific evidence regarding the effects of this policy, this study systematically reviews all empirical scientific studies on the effects of VPAs. We found that almost all relevant studies are case reports that use qualitative data and focus on only one country at a time, mainly Ghana, Cameroon, or Indonesia. The evidence suggests that while VPAs have contributed to the establishment of governance structures, tools, and procedures they have not been able to solve social problems (i.e., inequality and injustice) and have potentially harmed the economies of EU timber suppliers. Evidence on the effects of VPAs on illegal logging and trade and the environment remains limited. Thus, future research should focus on more countries; use a greater range of methods, including comparative experimental designs; explore possible intended effects on under-researched categories; and systematically investigate unintended effects on other categories within and outside the forestry sector.

Document type Review article
Note With supplementary file.
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116874
Downloads
1-s2.0-S0301479722024471-main (Final published version)
Supplementary materials
Permalink to this page
Back