Norms in multilevel groundwater governance and sustainable development

Open Access
Authors
Supervisors
Cosupervisors
Award date 04-07-2017
Number of pages 246
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG)
Abstract
Groundwater constitutes 98-99% of the world’s available freshwater resources. Humans abstract 200 times more groundwater than oil - using it heavily for domestic, municipal, agricultural and industrial purposes. Consequently, humans cause groundwater depletion and quality degradation in some locations; while underutilizing it in others, due to financial, technological, and/or geographic constraints. Yet, normative aspects of groundwater governance frameworks inadequately address groundwater’s unique physical attributes; do not counter drivers of groundwater problems; and do not discuss groundwater from a sustainability or inclusive development perspective. Therefore, the thesis poses the question: What are the shortcomings of the current normative architecture for sustainable and inclusive groundwater governance and what are the key elements of a normative architecture at multiple geographic levels that are consistent with sustainable and inclusive development?
In response, the thesis integrated institutional analysis with the concepts of multilevel governance, Earth System governance, sustainable and inclusive development, ecosystems services, and legal pluralism. Mapping and descriptive statistics identified patterns in a database of over 200 global, regional-transboundary, and national groundwater laws and policies. Exploration of groundwater governance in the Stampriet Transboundary Aquifer System in southern Africa further contextualized the analysis. The findings indicate that groundwater governance frameworks need to address groundwater’s specific physical attributes; more deeply integrate social and relational elements (e.g. public participation and poverty eradication); address climate change and trade impacts on groundwater; integrate capacity building and data gathering; assess equivalence and/or pluralism between formal and customary governance frameworks; and address opportunities for increased, yet sustainable and inclusive groundwater use.
Document type PhD thesis
Language English
Downloads
Permalink to this page
cover
Back