Predator-prey interactions How thrips avoid predation
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 01-2024 |
| Journal | Biological Control |
| Article number | 105437 |
| Volume | Issue number | 188 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Biological pest control is successful in many agricultural systems, yet
various pests can still not be controlled with natural enemies. Examples
are invasive thrips species such as Echinothrips americanus Morgan and Thrips parvispinus
(Karny) in Europe. The lack of biological control of these pests in
several crops has been subscribed to their complex life cycle and
cryptic behaviours, but their antipredator behaviours may prevent
successful control and have not been studied extensively. One of these
behaviours is the potential of thrips to kill the eggs of predatory
mites, which we quantified. Furthermore, we observed the behaviour of
first- and second-instar thrips larvae when attacked by starved
predatory mites Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot. For comparison, we included Frankliniella occidentalis
(Pergande), which shows an array of defensive behaviours, but can be
controlled successfully by several species of predatory mites.
Second-instar larvae and adults of F. occidentalis and T. parvispinus killed predator eggs, but E. americanus did not. First- and second-instar larvae of all three species swung their abdomen to defend themselves, and F. occidentalis and T. parvispinus
produced anal droplets, which are also involved in defence. Predators
were not successful in attacking any second-instar larvae during
15-minute observations, which is sufficiently long for an attack.
First-instar larvae of F. occidentalis and T. parvispinus were sometimes successfully attacked by the predatory mite before they could mount a defence, but first-instar E. americanus
always defended themselves and were almost never preyed upon. Cooling
thrips larvae to suppress antipredator behaviour increased predation for
all species and stages, except for first instars of F. occidentalis. In conclusion, the lack of successful control of E. americanus
is not caused by killing predator eggs, but by the efficient defensive
behaviour of both larval instars. Our study furthermore suggests that T. parvispinus can potentially be controlled by A. swirskii.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Note | With supplementary file. |
| Language | English |
| Related dataset | Data Beretta et al. 2024 Biological Control 188 105437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2023.105437 |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2023.105437 |
| Other links | https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85181652229 |
| Downloads |
1-s2.0-S1049964423002906-main
(Final published version)
|
| Supplementary materials | |
| Permalink to this page | |
