Being a Constitutional Court in a post-sovereign interconstitutional order

describe some of the challenges facing a national constitutional court that
functions in a situation of a multiplicity of constitutional orders. It provides a typology of the conflict rules in terms of their priority and in terms of the effect of the solution, i.e. whether the prevailing norm as such applies across the EU or only locally. Next it reflects on the rationales of the various conflict rules, and how they inform the dynamics of constitutional relations between national constitutional orders and the EU order; or, put differently, between what national constitutional courts are guardians of, and what the European Court of Justice is guardian of.