History's (Un)Reason Victorian Intellectualism from J.S. Mill to Leslie Stephen
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2011 |
| Journal | Victorian Studies |
| Volume | Issue number | 53 | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 457-467 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Conceptions of progress abounded in the Victorian period, and works of
intellectual history were instrumental in illustrating and interrogating
the laws of the progressive development of modern societies. Among the
axioms that informed progressive historiography was the
““intellectualist”” assumption of the privileged and incremental
historical agency of speculation, knowledge, and ideas. This paper
considers the role of John Stuart Mill's System of Logic (1843)
in shaping an intellectualist paradigm in Victorian liberal
historiography. It focuses on Leslie Stephen's methodological
reflections in the History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century
(1876), which it analyzes in terms of a revision of Mill's concept of
regulative ideas that suggests how intellectual history was fully caught
up in the mid-Victorian ““crisis of reason.””
|
| Document type | Article |
| Note | In special issue: Papers and Responses from the Eighth Annual Conference of the North American Victorian Studies Association (Spring 2011). |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.2979/victorianstudies.53.3.457 |
| Published at | http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/victorian_studies/v053/53.3.de-waard.html |
| Downloads |
victorianstudies.53.3.457
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |