Loneliness is positively associated with populist radical right support
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 02-2025 |
| Journal | Social Science & Medicine |
| Article number | 117676 |
| Volume | Issue number | 366 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
OBJECTIVES: The mental and physical health consequences of loneliness are well documented. However, loneliness's socio-political ramifications have been largely unexplored. We theorize that loneliness, due to its physiologically dysregulating impact on the nervous system, facilitates greater susceptibility towards populist radical right parties. METHODS: We tested our hypothesis in 25 unique tests in four population-based samples (N = 40852), spanning nine countries - the Netherlands (15 tests, 2008-2023), Germany (two samples; 2017, 2018), Austria, Croatia, Denmark, France, Hungary, Sweden, and Switzerland (all in 2017). Logistic regressions were run per year and per country. Two internal meta-analyses were run, the first for the Dutch sample and the second for the cross country dataset. RESULTS: In the Netherlands, lonelier individuals were more likely to support the populist radical right across 15 tests spanning 15 years of data, with 11 tests reaching statistical significance - odds ratios ranging from 1.1 to 1.38. For the cross country analysis, Denmark reached statistical significance (OR = 1.2, 90% CI = 1.01, 1.42). Due to smaller sample sizes however, the cross country tests were underpowered to reliably detect small effects. CONCLUSIONS: Loneliness is positively associated with support for the populist radical right in the Netherlands. The effect sizes are comparable to common health correlates of loneliness - high blood pressure, heart diseases, and depression - emphasizing their socio-political relevance. Going forward, well-powered cross-national replications are needed. |
| Document type | Article |
| Note | Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved. |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117676 |
| Downloads |
1-s2.0-S027795362500005X-main
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
