| Authors |
|
| Publication date |
2018
|
| Host editors |
|
| Book title |
Argumentation and Inference
|
| Book subtitle |
Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation
|
| ISBN |
|
| Series |
Studies in logic: Logic and argumentation
|
| Event |
2nd European Conference on Argumentation
|
| Volume | Issue number |
2
|
| Pages (from-to) |
909-924
|
| Publisher |
London: College Publications
|
| Organisations |
-
Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
|
| Abstract |
This paper investigates what functions metaphors can have in argumentation and how they may provoke resistance. The pragma-dialectical theory and Steen’s (2008) 3D-model of metaphor are integrated to determine the possible uses of ‘deliberate’ metaphor in argumentation. Based on case studies, it is argued that deliberate metaphors can not only function as single analogy arguments, but also as complex argumentation consisting of both analogy and e.g. causal or symptomatic arguments, that each may counter resistance.
|
| Document type |
Conference contribution
|
| Language |
English
|
| Other links |
http://ecargument.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/ECA2017-Info-Vol-II.pdf
https://www.collegepublications.co.uk/logic/sla/?00011
|
|
Permalink to this page
|