After the celebration: Marriage equality in EU Law post-Coman in eight questions and some further thoughts
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 10-2020 |
| Journal | Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law |
| Volume | Issue number | 27 | 5 |
| Pages (from-to) | 549-572 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
This paper provides a detailed critical analysis of the case of Coman,
where the Court of Justice clarified that the meaning of the term
‘spouse’ in Directive 2004/38 was gender-neutral, opening up the door
for same-sex marriage recognition for immigration purposes all around
the EU, thus destroying the heteronormative misinterpretations of the
clear language of the Directive practised in a handful of Member States.
The state of EU law after Coman is still far from perfect,
however: we underline a line of important questions which remain open
and which the Court will need to turn to in the near future to ensure
that marriage equality moves beyond mere proclamations in the whole
territory of the Union.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Note | With rgard to: Case C-673/16 Coman et al. v. Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări, EU:C:2018:385. |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X20962749 |
| Downloads |
1023263x20962749
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |