Exploring the Decision-Making Process for Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Their Relatives After Treatment

Open Access
Authors
  • J. Rovers
  • L. Schönberger
  • D. Loef
  • P. van Eijndhoven
  • E. Verwijk ORCID logo
  • M. Somers
  • A. Dols
  • I. Tendolkar
Publication date 09-2025
Journal The Journal of ECT
Volume | Issue number 41 | 3
Pages (from-to) 197-205
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract
Objectives: Shared decision making is used for reaching medical decisions, also in the management of major depressive disorder (MDD). Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment option for patients with severe MDD. However, the decision-making process, specifically the exchange of evidence-based information, for ECT may be hampered by the controversy and stigma surrounding ECT. We aim to explore the experiences of the decision-making process of patients and their relatives who have chosen to receive ECT in order to guide optimization of shared decision making in ECT.
Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with MDD patients and their relatives who had voluntarily received ECT between 2018-2023 at the Radboud University Medical Center, the Netherlands. The interviews were analyzed by thematic analysis.
Results: Meaning saturation occurred after 16 interviews. The following 3 major themes emerged: 1) information is key, 2) empowering the decision, and 3) lived experiences with ECT. Participants emphasized the importance of accessible information presented in a calm and stepwise manner. They also identified gaps in desired information, particularly regarding memory loss and difficulty in retaining the given information. Factors empowering the decision included support from family, healthcare professionals, peers, and desperation, while negative factors included stigma, negative images, lack of support, and fear. Lived experiences with ECT might influence a future decision. Positive experiences were improved attitudes, treatment effects, and empathic and involved professionals, while negative aspects included cognitive side effects and lack of follow-up.
Conclusions: This study offers insights into factors influencing the decision-making process in patients with MDD that received ECT. It shows possibilities for improving the decision-making process in clinical practice.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001106
Downloads
Supplementary materials
Permalink to this page
Back