“It’s the democracy, stupid!” in defence of KlimaSeniorinnen

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2025
Journal ERA Forum
Volume | Issue number 25 | 4
Pages (from-to) 451-470
Organisations
  • Faculty of Law (FdR) - Amsterdam Center for European Law and Governance (ACELG)
Abstract
Small numbers of litigants asking a small number of unelected judges to impose limits on majoritarian decision-making stands at least prima facie in tension with majoritarianism as a central legitimizing principle of democracy in Europe. In KlimaSeniorinnen, the European Court of Human Rights required the Contracting Parties to quantify a fair share national carbon budget. Several aspects of the ruling demonstrate great deference to the national democratic process: how the Court emphasized climate exceptionalism, extended NGO standing, reduced the States’ margin of discretion in relation to their (international) climate commitments, and approached extraterritoriality.
Document type Article
Language English
Related publication Strengthening democracy beyond majoritarianism
Published at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-025-00828-w
Downloads
s12027-025-00828-w (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back