Towards consensus on visual pursuit and visual fixation in patients with disorders of consciousness. A Delphi study

Authors
  • B.U.H. Overbeek
  • J.C.M. Lavrijsen
  • S. van Gaal ORCID logo
  • D. Kondziella
  • H.J. Eilander
  • R.T.C.M. Koopmans
Publication date 06-2022
Journal Journal of neurology
Volume | Issue number 269 | 6
Pages (from-to) 3204-3215
Number of pages 12
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract
Background
The aim of this Delphi study was to reach consensus about definition, operationalization and assessment of visual pursuit (VP) and visual fixation (VF).
Methods
In a three-round international Delphi study, clinical and research experts on disorders of consciousness indicated their level of agreement on 87 statements using a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus for agreement was defined by a median of 5, an interquartile range (IQR) ≤ 1, and ≥ 80% indicating moderate or strong agreement.
Results
Forty-three experts from three continents participated, 32 completed all three rounds. For VP, the consensus statements with the highest levels of agreement were on the term ‘pursuit of a visual stimulus’, the description ‘ability to follow visually in horizontal and/or vertical plane’, a duration > 2 s, tracking in horizontal and vertical planes, and a frequency of more than 2 times per assessment. For VF, consensus statements with the highest levels of agreement were on the term ‘sustained VF’, the description ‘sustained fixation in response to a salient stimulus’, a duration of > 2 s and a frequency of 2 or more times per assessment. The assessment factors with the highest levels of agreement were personalized stimuli, the use of eye tracking technology, a patient dependent time of assessment, sufficient environmental light, upright posture, and the necessity to exclude ocular/oculomotor problems.
Conclusion
This first international Delphi study on VP and VF in patients with disorders of consciousness provides provisional operational definitions and an overview of the most relevant assessment factors.
Document type Review article
Note With supplementary file
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10905-y
Permalink to this page
Back