Managing positive and negative media effects among adolescents: Parental mediation matters-but not always

Open Access
Authors
  • A. Meeus
  • I. Beyens ORCID logo
  • F. Geusens
  • A.K. Sodermans
  • K. Beullens
Publication date 2018
Journal Journal of Family Communication
Volume | Issue number 18 | 4
Pages (from-to) 270-285
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR)
Abstract
The current study examined the role of parental media mediation styles in the relationships between (1) prosocial media content and the performance of prosocial behavior and (2) antisocial media content and the performance of antisocial behavior. The results of a cross-sectional survey (N = 475; Mage = 14.6) indicated that autonomy-supportive restrictive mediation was positively related to prosocial behavior through increased prosocial media exposure, while it was also associated with less antisocial behavior through decreased antisocial media content exposure. Autonomy-supportive active mediation on the other hand strengthened the positive association between exposure to prosocial media content and the performance of prosocial behavior. However, this type of mediation did not moderate the association between exposure to antisocial media content and the performance of antisocial behavior. These results indicate that autonomy-supportive mediation styles are most effective in managing media effects, but that antisocial media content may warrant a more restrictive approach.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2018.1487443
Downloads
7_28_2020_Managing P (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back