Intentional content in psychopathologies requires an expanded interpretivism
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2019 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Article number | e26 |
| Volume | Issue number | 42 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
We argue that the explanatory role of intentional content in connecting symptoms in a network approach to psychopathology hinges neither on causality nor on rationality. Instead, we argue that it hinges on a pluralistic body of practical and clinical know-how. Incorporating this practical approach to intentional state ascription in psychopathological cases expands and improves traditional interpretivism. |
| Document type | Comment/Letter to the editor |
| Note | Commentary to: D. Borsboom, A.O.J. Cramer, A. Kalis (2019) Brain disorders? Not really: Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 42, e2. |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18001176 |
| Other links | https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85063898649 |
| Permalink to this page | |