The Divergence of Mandatory Climate Disclosure in the United States and European Union

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2026
Journal Law and Contemporary Problems
Volume | Issue number 88 | 2
Pages (from-to) 115-139
Number of pages 25
Organisations
  • Faculty of Law (FdR) - Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics (ACLE)
Abstract
In this article, we ask why mandatory disclosure of climate risk differs between the U.S. and the EU. We identify a fundamentally different legal basis for securities regulation on the two sides of the Atlantic. While the EU treaty provides EU institutions with legislative authority to introduce far-reaching climate disclosure obligations, the SEC faces significant hurdles to do so under U.S. administrative and constitutional law. We focus on the SEC because it has acted on climate. Congress could pass a comprehensive climate disclosure statute, but the subject is controversial in the United States, and so the legislature is unlikely to act. Moreover, we discuss pros and cons of climate disclosure from an economic perspective. Finally, we discuss the recent developments in climate disclosure regulation, both in the EU and in California, and their potential to set voluntary disclosure standards for companies not subject to these jurisdictions.
Document type Article
Note In special issue: U.S.-EU Comparative Financial Regulation.
Language English
Published at https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol88/iss2/6
Downloads
Permalink to this page
Back