Dishonesty under scrutiny

Authors
Publication date 2015
Journal Journal of the Economic Science Association
Volume | Issue number 1 | 1
Pages (from-to) 86-99
Organisations
  • Interfacultary Research - Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics (ACLE)
  • Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB) - Amsterdam School of Economics Research Institute (ASE-RI)
Abstract
We investigate how different forms of scrutiny affect dishonesty, using Gneezy’s [Am Econ Rev 95:384-394 (2005)] deception game. We add a third player whose interests are aligned with those of the sender. We find that lying behavior is not sensitive to revealing the sender’s identity to the observer. The option for observers to communicate with the sender, and the option to reveal the sender’s lies to the receiver also do not affect lying behavior. Even more striking, senders whose identity is revealed to their observer do not lie less when their interests are misaligned with those of the observer.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-015-0002-6
Permalink to this page
Back