Needs and preferences of patients with head and neck cancer in integrated care

Open Access
Authors
  • L.F.J. van Overveld
  • R.P. Takes
  • A.S. Turan
  • J.C.C. Braspenning
  • L.E. Smeele
  • M.A.W. Merkx
  • R.P.M.G. Hermens
  • the Dutch Head and Neck Audit Group
  • R.J. Baatenburg de Jong
  • J.P. de Boer
  • J.J.A. Brouns
  • R.J. Bun
  • B.A.C. van Dijk
  • J.A.W.F. Dortmans
  • R.J.J. van Es
  • F.J.P. Hoebers
  • A. Kropveld
  • J.A. Langendijk
  • T.P.M. Langeveld
  • S.F. Oosting
  • H.P. Verschuur
  • J.G.A.M. de Visscher
  • S. van Weert
Publication date 04-2018
Journal Clinical Otolaryngology
Volume | Issue number 43 | 2
Pages (from-to) 553-561
Organisations
  • Faculty of Dentistry (ACTA)
Abstract
Objectives: Incorporation of patients’ perspectives in daily practice is necessary to adapt care to users’ needs. However, information on patients’ needs and preferences for integrated care is lacking. The aim was to explore these needs and preferences, taking patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) as example, to adapt current integrated care to be more patient-centred.
Design: Semi-structured interviews were held with current and former patients and chairmen of patient associations. Relevant needs and preferences were identified and categorised using the eight-dimension Picker model of patient-centred care.
Setting: Integrated HNC in the Netherlands. Participants: Patients with HNC and chairmen of two Dutch HNC patient associations.
Main outcome measures: Patients’ needs and preferences of integrated HNC care categorised according the Picker model. Results: A total of 34 themes of needs and preferences were identified, by 14 patients with HNC or their delegates, using the Picker dimensions. Themes often emerged were as follows: personalisation of health care regarding patient values; clear insight into the healthcare process at organisational level; use of personalised communication, education and information that meets patients’ requirements; adequate involvement of allied health professionals for physical support; more attention to the impact of HNC and its treatment; adequate involvement of family and friends; adequate general practitioner involvement in the aftercare; and waiting time reduction.
Conclusions: Monitoring the identified themes in integrated HNC care, fitting in the Picker model, will enable us to respond better to the needs and preferences of patients, and patient-centred care in oncological care can be enhanced.
Document type Article
Note This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Needs and preferences of patients with head and neck cancer in integrated care van Overveld, L. F. J., Takes, R. P., Turan, A. S., Braspenning, J. C. C., Smeele, L. E., Merkx, M. A. W., Hermens, R. P. M. G. & the Dutch Head and Neck Audit Group. Apr 2018, In : Clinical Otolaryngology. 43, 2, p. 553-561, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13021. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13021
Other links https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85041837428
Downloads
Overveld_et_al-2017-Clinical_Otolaryngology (Accepted author manuscript)
Permalink to this page
Back