Data from a pre-publication independent replication initiative examining ten moral judgement effects

Open Access
Authors
  • W. Tierney
  • M. Schweinsberg
  • J. Jordan
  • D.M. Kennedy
  • I. Qureshi
  • S.A. Sommer
  • N. Thornley
  • N. Madan
  • M. Vianello
  • E. Awtrey
  • L.L. Zhu
  • D. Diermeier
  • J.E. Heinze
  • M. Srinivasan
  • D. Tannenbaum
  • E. Bivolaru
  • J. Dana
  • C.P. Davis-Stober
  • C. du Plessis
  • Q.F. Gronau
  • A.C. Hafenbrack
  • E.Y. Liao
  • A. Ly ORCID logo
  • M. Marsman ORCID logo
  • T. Murase
  • M. Schaerer
  • C.M. Tworek
  • E.-J. Wagenmakers
  • L. Wong
  • T. Anderson
  • C.W. Bauman
  • W.L. Bedwell
  • V. Brescoll
  • A. Canavan
  • J.J. Chandler
  • E. Cheries
  • S. Cheryan
  • F. Cheung
  • A. Cimpian
  • M.A. Clark
  • D. Cordon
  • F. Cushman
  • P.H. Ditto
  • A. Amell
  • S.E. Frick
  • M. Gamez-Djokic
  • R. Hofstein Grady
  • J. Graham
  • J. Gu
  • A. Hahn
  • B.E. Hanson
  • N.J. Hartwich
  • K. Hein
  • Y. Inbar
  • L. Jiang
  • T. Kellogg
  • N. Legate
  • T.P. Luoma
  • H. Maibeucher
  • P. Meindl
  • J. Miles
  • A. Mislin
  • D.C. Molden
  • M. Motyl
  • G. Newman
  • H.H. Ngo
  • H. Packham
  • P.S. Ramsay
  • J.L. Ray
  • A.M. Sackett
  • A.-L. Sellier
  • T. Sokolova
  • W. Sowden
  • D. Storage
  • X. Sun
  • J.J. Van Bavel
  • A.N. Washburn
  • C. Wei
  • E. Wetter
  • C.T. Wilson
  • S.-C. Darroux
  • E.L. Uhlmann
Publication date 11-10-2016
Journal Scientific Data
Article number 160082
Volume | Issue number 3
Number of pages 7
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract
We present the data from a crowdsourced project seeking to replicate findings in independent laboratories before (rather than after) they are published. In this Pre-Publication Independent Replication (PPIR) initiative, 25 research groups attempted to replicate 10 moral judgment effects from a single laboratory’s research pipeline of unpublished findings. The 10 effects were investigated using online/lab surveys containing psychological manipulations (vignettes) followed by questionnaires. Results revealed a mix of reliable, unreliable, and culturally moderated findings. Unlike any previous replication project, this dataset includes the data from not only the replications but also from the original studies, creating a unique corpus that researchers can use to better understand reproducibility and irreproducibility in science.
Document type Article
Note Data descriptor. - With supplementary files
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.82
Other links https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84991111172
Downloads
sdata201682-s1 (Other version)
sdata201682-s2 (Other version)
Permalink to this page
Back