Communicative Competence and Local Theories of Argumentation: The Case of Academic Citational Practices
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2021 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Local Theories of Argument |
| ISBN |
|
| ISBN (electronic) |
|
| Pages (from-to) | 497-503 |
| Publisher | London: Routledge |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
When people argue in a specific context, they usually know exactly how to do that. The social knowledge participants have to form their expectations regarding the interaction is what we consider as their theory of argumentation. Elucidating the theories of the participants in argumentative exchanges is to formulate a local theory of argumentation. In this regard, we consider the ethnography of communication (EoC) as a framework to supplement our studies on argumentation. We believe there are three forms of social knowledge that affect how argumentation is conducted in context. First, participants know what is persuasive within their interactional context. Second, they know how this interaction is appropriately conducted. Third, they attempt to enact and recreate their understanding of the context through their talk.
|
| Document type | Chapter |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003149026 |
| Published at | https://scholarworks.umass.edu/communication_grads_pubs/13/ |
| Other links | https://www.amazon.nl/-/en/Dale-Hample/dp/0367710358 |
| Downloads |
Communicative Competence and Local Theories of Argumentation_ The1
(Submitted manuscript)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
