The Myth of Market Neutrality A Comparative Study of the European Central Bank’s and the Swiss National Bank’s Corporate Security Purchases

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 12-2020
Journal New Political Economy
Volume | Issue number 25 | 6
Pages (from-to) 865-879
Number of pages 15
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
Abstract
Monetary policy operations in corporate security markets confront central banks with choices that are traditionally perceived to be the prerogative of governments. This article investigates how central bankers legitimise corporate security purchases through a comparative study of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Swiss National Bank (SNB). As we show, central bankers downplay the novelty of corporate security purchases by relying on familiar pre-crisis justifications of Central Bank Independence. Citing an ideal of ‘market neutrality’, central banks present corporate security purchases as pursuing a narrow objective of price stability and obfuscate their distributive consequences. In this way, central bankers depoliticise corporate security purchases: they reduce the potential for choice, collective agency, and deliberation concerning both the pursuit of corporate security purchases and the choices made in implementing these policies. We also describe the undesirable democratic, social and environmental dimensions of these practices, which we propose to address through enhanced democratic accountability.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1657077
Downloads
Permalink to this page
Back