Three strong moves to improve research and replications alike
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2018 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Article number | e130 |
| Volume | Issue number | 41 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | We suggest three additional improvements to replication practices. First, original research should include concrete checks on validity, encouraged by editorial standards. Second, the reasons for replicating a particular study should be more transparent and balance systematic positive reasons with selective negative ones. Third, methodological validity should also be factored into evaluating replications, with methodologically inconclusive replications not counted as non-replications. |
| Document type | Comment/Letter to the editor |
| Note | Commentary to: Zwaan, R.A., Etz, A., Lucas, R.E., & Donnellan, M.B. (2018) Making replication mainstream. In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 41, e120. |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18000651 |
| Downloads |
Three-strong-moves-to-improve-research-and-replications-alike
(Submitted manuscript)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
