Involving stakeholders in policy research should not imply that they control the problem definition: lessons from a case study on new analgesics

Authors
  • M. Moret-Hartman
  • G.J. van der Wilt
  • J. Grin ORCID logo
Publication date 2009
Journal International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management
Volume | Issue number 10 | 6
Pages (from-to) 361-377
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
Abstract
The Dutch Health Care Insurance Board (HCIB) commissions research to guide their policy recommendations. However, the studies conducted do not always yield relevant information. This may result from differences in problem definitions held by the HCIB and target populations. To compensate these problems, researchers were asked to analyse the problems from the perspective of the policy's target populations. We analysed the HCIB's commissioning approach when used in a tender for research proposals on new analgesics. The HCIB considered off-label use of these drugs to be problematic. Researchers, however, were reluctant to adopt the HCIB's problem definition, questioning whether it would be shared by 'the field'. Although most of the physicians did not consider their prescribing patterns to be problematic, one of the new drugs had to be withdrawn from the market because of severe side effects. These findings emphasise that involving target populations in policy research should not imply that they control the problem definition.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHTM.2009.030692
Permalink to this page
Back