Condorcet Markets

The paper studies information markets concerning single events from an epistemic social choice perspective. Within the classical Condorcet error model for collective binary decisions, we establish equivalence results between elections and markets, showing that the alternative that would be selected by weighted majority voting (under specific weighting schemes) corresponds to the alternative with highest price in the equilibrium of the market (under specific assumptions on the market type). This points to the possibility, in principle, of implementing specific weighted majority elections, which are known to have superior truth-tracking performance, by means of information markets without needing to elicit voters’ competences.