Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes?
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 07-2023 |
| Journal | Review of Economics and Statistics |
| Volume | Issue number | 105 | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 818–832 |
| Number of pages | 45 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Despite decades of research on heuristics and biases, evidence on the effect of large incentives on cognitive biases is scant. We test the effect of incentives on four widely documented biases: base-rate neglect, anchoring, failure of contingent thinking, and intuitive reasoning. In laboratory experiments with 1,236 college students in Nairobi, we implement three incentive levels: no incentives, standard lab payments, and very high incentives. We find that very high stakes increase response times by 40% but improve performance only very mildly or not at all. In none of the tasks do very high stakes come close to debiasing participants.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Note | With supplementary file |
| Language | English |
| Related dataset | Replication data for: Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes? |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01093 https://doi.org/10.3386/w28650 |
| Downloads |
rest_a_01093
(Final published version)
w28650
(Other version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
