From diagnostic conformity to co-narration of self-insight in mental health care

Open Access
Authors
  • S.M. van Geelen
Publication date 08-2024
Journal Nature Mental Health
Volume | Issue number 2 | 8
Pages (from-to) 883-892
Number of pages 10
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis (ASCA)
Abstract
In mental health care, large differences in perspective between individuals with psychosis and professionals are an everyday reality. Such discrepancies become apparent in the substantial number of patients judged to lack illness insight. This Perspective argues that ‘illness insight’ typically refers to patient conformity to medical views rather than denoting true understanding into their condition. We outline limitations of the current conceptualization of illness insight (‘clinical insight’) and discuss an alternative, narrative understanding, drawing on literature from various academic disciplines. After addressing definitional ambiguities, etiological complexities and methodological inconsistencies inherent to the current understanding, this paper highlights several normative, cultural and ethical issues surrounding clinical insight. A narrative approach allows patients to find more meaningful explanations that resonate better with the complexity of their experiences and tackles other problems identified with clinical insight. We argue that narrative insight is inherently co-constructed, emphasizing the shared meaning-making process between individuals with psychosis and professionals.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00284-4
Downloads
Nature MH self-insight Ermers et al. 2024 (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back