Why Did Israelis Comply with COVID-19 Mitigation Measures During the Initial First Wave Lockdown?

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 01-09-2020
Series Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper, 2020-52
Number of pages 23
Publisher Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, Paul Scholten Centre for Jurisprudence
Organisations
  • Faculty of Law (FdR) - Paul Scholten Centre for Jurisprudence (PSC)
Abstract
This paper investigates why Israeli citizens complied with measures taken to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 virus in early April. At the time, Israel had relatively stringent mitigation measures that encouraged people to stay at home and keep a safe social distance. The data of 411 adult participants, gathered using survey research, showed that overall, compliance levels at that time were high. It finds that compliance depended on a combination of moral factors, such as people’s moral duty to obey the law and people’s tendency to obey the law generally. In addition, people who had friends over 75 years old were more likely to comply. Furthermore, people were more likely to comply if they were able to do so, and less likely to violate if they did not have the opportunity to do so. The study did not find that fear of punishment (deterrence) was significantly associated with compliance. Overall, these findings are in line with studies conducted the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands.
Document type Working paper
Language English
Related dataset Cross-Theoretical Compliance: An Integrative Compliance Analysis of COVID-19 Mitigation Responses in Israel Compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures in the Netherlands
Published at https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3681964 https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vm8x9
Downloads
ssrn-3681964 (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back