ICTR (Case No. ICTR-99-50-AR50: Prosecutor v. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka and Mugiraneza: Decision on Prosecutor’s Interlocutory Appeal Against Trial Chamber II Decision of 6 October 2003 Denying Leave to File Amended Indictment)

Comment on:
- ICTR. (2004, February 12), (Case No. ICTR-99-50-AR50: Prosecutor v. Bizimungu, Mugenzi, Bicamumpaka and Mugiraneza: Decision on Prosecutor’s Interlocutory Appeal Against Trial Chamber II Decision of 6 October 2003 Denying Leave to File Amended Indictment)
- Individual Opinion of Judge Pocar
- ICTR. (2004, May 6), (Case No. ICTR-01-76-I: Prosecutor v. Simba: Decision on Preliminary Defence Motion Regarding Defects in the Form of the Indictment)
- ICTR. (2004, May 11), (Case No. ICTR-98-44-T: Prosecutor v. Karemera, Ngirumpatse, Nzirorera and Rwamakuba: Decision on the Preliminary Motions by the Defence of Joseph Nzirorera, Édouard Karemera, André Rwamakuba and Mathieu Ngirumpatse Challenging Jurisdiction in Relation to Joint Criminal Enterprise (Article 6(1) of the Statute, Rule 72 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence))
- Separate Opinion of Judge Lattanzi
- ICTR. (2004, July 14), (Case No. ICTR-01-76-I: Prosecutor v. Simba: Decision on the Defence’s Preliminary Motion Challenging the Second Amended Indictment)
- ICTR. (2004, July 15), (Case No. ICTR-2001-73-I: Prosecutor v. Zigiranyirazo: Decision on the Defence Preliminary Motion Objecting to the Form of the Amended Indictment (Rule 72 (A) (ii) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence))
- ICTR. (2004, October 22), (Case No. ICTR-98-4-AR72.4: Rwamakuba v. Prosecutor: Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Regarding Application of Joint Criminal Enterprise to the Crime of Genocide)