Memory is no longer what it used to be
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2016 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Memory in the twenty-first century: New critical perspectives from the arts, humanities, and sciences |
| ISBN |
|
| ISBN (electronic) |
|
| Pages (from-to) | 213-216 |
| Publisher | London: Palgrave Macmillan |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
In Difference and Repetition, Gilles Deleuze develops a
philosophy of time that allows three different conceptualizations of
memory: memory conceived from the present, memory from the past and
memory from the future.1 According to Deleuze, in any human
being there is always an interplay between these different ways of
conceiving memory and time more generally. On a more collective cultural
level, however, I propose that we have moved into new dominant way of
understanding memory: In the twenty-first century we increasingly
conceive memory from the point of view of possible futures. In
contemporary cinema, as well as elsewhere in culture, memory is no
longer what it used to be.
|
| Document type | Chapter |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137520586_26 |
| Published at | https://research.ebsco.com/plink/b8494dd2-9bd6-3205-9f73-b2511eca2c52 |
| Downloads |
SebastianGroes_2016_25MemoryIsNoLongerWha_MemoryintheTwenty-Fir
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
