Inferential Expressivism and the Negation Problem
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2021 |
| Journal | Oxford Studies in Metaethics |
| Volume | Issue number | 16 |
| Pages (from-to) | 80-107 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
This chapter develops a novel solution to the
negation version of the Frege–Geach problem by taking up recent insights
from the bilateral programme in logic. Bilateralists explain the
meaning of negation in terms of a primitive B-type inconsistency
involving the attitudes of assent and dissent. Some may demand an
explanation of this inconsistency in simpler terms, but here it is
argued that bilateralism’s assumptions are no less explanatory than
those of A-type semantics that only require a single primitive
attitude, but must stipulate inconsistency elsewhere. A version of
B-type expressivism called inferential expressivism—a novel semantic framework that characterizes meanings by inferential roles that define which attitudes one can infer
from the use of terms—is developed. This framework is applied to
normative vocabulary, thereby solving the Frege–Geach problem generally
and comprehensively. The chapter includes a semantics for epistemic
modals, thereby also explaining normative terms under epistemic modals.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192897466.003.0004 |
| Published at | https://marcsandersfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Negation_problem-1.pdf |
| Other links | https://global.oup.com/academic/product/oxford-studies-in-metaethics-volume-16-9780192897466 https://www.amazon.com/Oxford-Studies-Metaethics-Russ-Shafer-Landau/dp/0192897462 |
| Downloads |
Negation_problem-1
(Submitted manuscript)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
