The role of the intestinal microbiota in pneumonia and sepsis
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Supervisors |
|
| Cosupervisors | |
| Award date | 19-05-2017 |
| ISBN |
|
| Number of pages | 242 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Humans carry with them trillions of bacteria, viruses and fungi that are collectively called the human microbiota. The intestinal microbiota fulfills essential functions in human physiology and has recently been suggested as a potential therapeutic target for several diseases. This thesis focuses on the role of the intestinal microbiota in pneumonia and sepsis. Our main hypothesis was that the gut microbiota plays a protective role in innate host defenses against systemic bacterial infections; i.e., that microbiota disruption by antibiotics would negatively affect the innate immune response during pneumonia and sepsis. In a translational fashion we used both murine and human models to test this hypothesis. We observed profound microbial disturbances in septic patients: bacterial genera that are involved in metabolism had disappeared, as well as bacteria that are supposed to have beneficial immunomodulatory effects. In healthy humans, microbiota disruption by broad-spectrum antibiotics slightly affected the innate immune response in vitro, but not in vivo. In mice, microbiota disruption by broad-spectrum antibiotics was associated with increased growth of bacteria during pneumonia-induced sepsis. Furthermore, our data suggest that the intestinal microbiota of different groups of mice may be a confounder in infection- and inflammation-related mouse models. Antibiotics are essential in treating infections, but may have indirect side-effects that we are currently unaware of. The interplay between (intestinal) microbiota, immune system, pathogens and other antibiotics is difficult to dissect. However, modulation of the intestinal microbiota should be further explored as a potential therapeutic tool to boost the immune system of septic patients.
|
| Document type | PhD thesis |
| Note | The final publication of chapter 3 is available at Nature Publishing Group via http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2016.43 The final publication of chapter 4 is available at BMJ Journals via http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312132 The final publication of chapter 5 is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4613-z The final publication of chapter 7 is available at BMJ Journals via http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309728 The final publication of chapter 9 is available at PLOS via http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005548 The final publication of chapter 11 is available at Taylor and Francis via http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2017.1307485 Please note that the acknowledgements section is not included in the thesis downloads. |
| Language | English |
| Downloads | |
| Permalink to this page | |