Compliance with COVID-19 Mitigation Measures in the United States

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 22-04-2020
Number of pages 40
Publisher PsyArXiv
Organisations
  • Faculty of Law (FdR) - Paul Scholten Centre for Jurisprudence (PSC)
Abstract
The COVID-19 mitigation measures require a fundamental shift in human behavior. The present study assesses what factors influence Americans to comply with the stay at home and social distancing measures. It analyzes data from an online survey, conducted on April 3, 2020, of 570 participants from 35 states that have adopted such measures. The results show that while perceptual deterrence was not associated with compliance, people actually comply less when they fear the authorities. Further, two broad processes promote compliance. First, compliance depended on people’s capacity to obey the rules, opportunity to break the rules, and self-control. As such, compliance results from their own personal abilities and the context in which they live. Second, compliance depended on people’s intrinsic motivations, including substantive moral support and social norms. This paper discusses the implications of these findings for ensuring compliance to effectively mitigate the virus.
Document type Preprint
Note Also published by University of Amsterdam, Paul Scholten Centre for Jurisprudence, as: Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2020-21. - Supplemental materials available on PsyArXiv.
Language English
Related dataset Compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures in the Netherlands
Related publication Compliance in the 1.5 Meter Society
Published at https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qymu3 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3582626
Other links https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2KSMQ
Downloads
SSRN-id3582626 (Other version)
Permalink to this page
Back