Great minds map alike Citizen and expert distribution models of schistosome snail hosts in rural west Uganda
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 12-2025 |
| Journal | Ecological solutions and evidence |
| Article number | e70163 |
| Volume | Issue number | 6 | 4 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Schistosomiasis is a parasitic disease that affects
over 250 million people worldwide, with the majority living in rural
areas of sub-Saharan Africa. The parasite relies on freshwater snails of
the genus Biomphalaria as intermediate hosts. Mapping snail
distribution is vital for identifying disease transmission hotspots.
However, expert-led monitoring is often constrained by limited resources
and restricted access to remote areas, highlighting the need for
scalable and cost-effective alternatives.This study evaluates the effectiveness of citizen science in predicting Biomphalaria
spp. presence by comparing models built from expert - and
citizen-collected data. We tested two scenarios: the first one assumed
perfect detection and focused on environmental and geomorphological
predictors, while the second accounted for imperfect detection to
explore discrepancies between citizen observations and expert-derived
detection probabilities.In the perfect detection scenario, the expert and
citizen models identified site type and NDVI as significant
environmental predictors of snail presence. Although both models
demonstrated low marginal R2 values (~16%–17%), indicating limited explanatory power of broad-scale environmental predictors, conditional R2 values exceeded 65%, suggesting that fine-scale, site-specific habitat characteristics are critical determinants of Biomphalaria
spp. presence. For the imperfect detection scenario, the expert model
and the citizen observations showed minimal discrepancies, primarily
explained by individual observer variability and differences in sampling
effort. Increased sampling effort consistently reduced false negatives
and led to unexpected observations of snail presence by the citizens
(i.e. observed presence in sites predicted unsuitable by the expert
model).Practical implication. Our findings
demonstrate that citizen science data, when properly structured and
statistically accounted for bias and errors, can generate ecological
modelling outputs comparable to those based on expert-led surveys. We
highlight the importance of accounting for observer variability,
providing calibrated training and optimizing sampling strategies to
enhance data quality. This study presents a transferable and
cost-efficient framework for participatory ecological monitoring in
resource-limited and undersampled regions.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Note | With supplementary material. |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.70163 |
| Other links | https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105024529588 |
| Downloads | |
| Supplementary materials | |
| Permalink to this page | |
