Concepts and bounded rationality: An application of Niestegge's approach to conditional quantum probabilities

Authors
Publication date 2009
Host editors
  • L. Accardi
  • G. Adenier
  • C.A. Fuchs
  • G. Jaeger
  • A.Y. Khrennikov
  • J.-Å. Larsson
  • S. Senholm
Book title Foundations of Probability and Physics-5
Book subtitle Växjö, Sweden, 24-27 August 2008
ISBN
  • 9780735406360
Series AIP Conference Proceedings
Event International Conference Foundations of Probability and Physics-5 (FPP5), Växjö, Sweden
Pages (from-to) 302-310
Publisher Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics
Organisations
  • Interfacultary Research - Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC)
Abstract
Recently, Gerd Niestegge developed a new approach to quantum mechanics via conditional probabilities developing the well-known proposal to consider the Lüders-von Neumann measurement as a non-classical extension of probability conditionalization. I will apply his powerful and rigorous approach to the treatment of concepts using a geometrical model of meaning. In this model, instances are treated as vectors of a Hilbert space H. In the present approach there are at least two possibilities to form categories. The first possibility sees categories as a mixture of its instances (described by a density matrix). In the simplest case we get the classical probability theory including the Bayesian formula. The second possibility sees categories formed by a distinctive prototype which is the superposition of the (weighted) instances. The construction of prototypes can be seen as transferring a mixed quantum state into a pure quantum state freezing the probabilistic characteristics of the superposed instances into the structure of the formed prototype. Closely related to the idea of forming concepts by prototypes is the existence of interference effects. Such inference effects are typically found in macroscopic quantum systems and I will discuss them in connection with several puzzles of bounded rationality. The present approach nicely generalizes earlier proposals made by authors such as Diederik Aerts, Andrei Khrennikov, Ricardo Franco, and Jerome Busemeyer. Concluding, I will suggest that an active dialogue between cognitive approaches to logic and semantics and the modern approach of quantum information science is mandatory.
Document type Conference contribution
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3109954
Permalink to this page
Back