Migratory Signifiers, Encrypted Symbols: How Globalization Mobilizes Aesthetics
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2015 |
| Journal | Chinese Semiotic Studies |
| Volume | Issue number | 11 | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 371-385 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
In this paper I apply the concept of migratory aesthetics to practices of performance and installation art. I begin with two examples of artists-migrants, the Nigerian-British artist Yinka Shonibare and the Vietnamese-American artist Dinkh Q. LĂȘ, and continue with Chinese artists who took the Great Wall of China as the locus but also the main motif of their performances and installations. I selected the work of Concept 21, the Yuanmingyuan group, and Xu Bing. I stress the importance of these art forms in relation to migratory aesthetics. I argue that it is the combination of signifiers inspired by Western art and Chinese iconographies - with sometimes intentionally encrypted symbols - that gives us a better understanding of the mobility and hybridity of aesthetics in times of globalization, which is therefore not restricted to artistic practices of migrants.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2015-0019 |
| Downloads |
2526244
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |