Migratory Signifiers, Encrypted Symbols: How Globalization Mobilizes Aesthetics

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2015
Journal Chinese Semiotic Studies
Volume | Issue number 11 | 3
Pages (from-to) 371-385
Number of pages 15
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis (ASCA)
Abstract
In this paper I apply the concept of migratory aesthetics to practices of performance and installation art. I begin with two examples of artists-migrants, the Nigerian-British artist Yinka Shonibare and the Vietnamese-American artist Dinkh Q. LĂȘ, and continue with Chinese artists who took the Great Wall of China as the locus but also the main motif of their performances and installations. I selected the work of Concept 21, the Yuanmingyuan group, and Xu Bing. I stress the importance of these art forms in relation to migratory aesthetics. I argue that it is the combination of signifiers inspired by Western art and Chinese iconographies - with sometimes intentionally encrypted symbols - that gives us a better understanding of the mobility and hybridity of aesthetics in times of globalization, which is therefore not restricted to artistic practices of migrants.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2015-0019
Downloads
2526244 (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back