The Proliferation of Constitutional Law and Constitutional Adjudication, or How American Judicial Review Came to Europe After All

Authors
Publication date 2013
Journal Utrecht Law Review
Volume | Issue number 9 | 2
Pages (from-to) 19-35
Organisations
  • Faculty of Law (FdR) - Amsterdam Center for European Law and Governance (ACELG)
  • Faculty of Law (FdR)
Abstract
This article submits that the continental European (Kelsenian) model of constitutional adjudication is affected, if not undermined, by the proliferation of constitutional adjudication outside centralized constitutional courts, due to 'globalization' in the European context, which results in a dispersion of constitutional adjudication that bears some of the traits of American judicial review. This contribution focuses on the institutional implications this has for the position and legitimacy of courts and constitutional adjudication by both national and European courts, and for the dynamics of their mutual relations. These implications and dynamics, it is submitted, are in some important respects different from the manner in which globalization plays out in American courts.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.223
Downloads
Permalink to this page
Back