The ontological argument and Russell's antinomy
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2009 |
| Journal | Logic and Logical Philosophy |
| Volume | Issue number | 18 | 3-4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 309-312 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | In this short note we respond to the claim made by Christopher Viger in [4] that Anselm’s so-called ontological argument falls prey to Russell’s paradox. We show that Viger’s argument is based on a flawed premise and hence does not in fact demonstrate what he claims it demonstrates. |
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2009.015 |
| Downloads |
rafalgruszczynski,+1045-3975-1-CE
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |