Vrijheid en verantwoordelijkheid: Waarom Frankfurt geen gelijk heeft en Sartre bijna

Authors
Publication date 12-2013
Journal Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte
Volume | Issue number 105 | 4
Pages (from-to) 210-227
Number of pages 17
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG)
Abstract
This paper argues that the philosophical analysis of moral responsibility would benefit from focusing more on the social freedom of individuals. In a critique of Frankfurt, it is argued that an individual only is responsible for the consequences of her action if she had the opportunity not be responsible for them. The resulting theory of moral responsibility is applied to the analysis of collective decision processes, and in particular to political decision making. The main conclusion is that, though we do not bear ‘absolute responsibility’ for all of the consequences of our actions, our moral and political responsibility is larger than often is assumed.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.5117/ANTW2013.4.HEES
Permalink to this page
Back