Differential framing effects: 11 more ways to study them rejoinder

Authors
Publication date 07-2023
Journal Decision
Volume | Issue number 10 | 3
Pages (from-to) 243-246
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG)
Abstract We appreciate the comments that Mandel and Reyna provided to the target article. Already, the target article discussed a multitude of angles to the framing effect. In their contributions, Mandel and Reyna have highlighted several aspects that may fruitfully be investigated in future studies, we suggest 11 ways to do so. We hope that these future studies will continue to employ formal modeling approaches, as they offer the opportunity to compare theories and make assumptions and interpretations explicit.
Document type Comment/Letter to the editor
Note Reply to: D.R. Mandel (2023) Subjective Equivalence : Commentary on Huizenga et al. (2023) A Basic Requirement for Strict Framing Effects. Volume 10 (3), p 235–237; and to: V.F. Reyna (2023) Models of Risky Choice Across Ages, Frames, and Individuals : The Fuzzy Frontier. Volume 10 (3), p 238–242.
Language English
Related publication Formal Models of Differential Framing Effects in Decision Making Under Risk
Published at https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000216
Published at https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=01762424-202307000-00004&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
Permalink to this page
Back