Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2010 |
| Journal | Oecologia |
| Volume | Issue number | 163 | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 335-340 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Theory on intraguild (IG) predation predicts that coexistence of IG-predators and IG-prey is only possible for a limited set of parameter values, suggesting that IG-predation would not be common in nature. This is in conflict with the observation that IG-predation occurs in many natural systems. One possible explanation for this difference might be antipredator behaviour of the IG-prey, resulting in decreased strength of IG-predation. We studied the distribution of an IG-prey, the predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae), in response to cues of its IG-predator, the predatory mite Iphiseius degenerans. Shortly after release, the majority of IG-prey was found on the patch without cues of IG-predators, suggesting that they can rapidly assess predation risk. IG-prey also avoided patches where conspecific juveniles had been killed by IG-predators. Because it is well known that antipredator behaviour in prey is affected by the diet of the predator, we also tested whether IG-prey change their distribution in response to the food of the IG-predators (pollen or conspecific juveniles), but found no evidence for this. The IG-prey laid fewer eggs on patches with cues of IG-predators than on patches without cues. Hence, IG-prey changed their distribution and oviposition in response to cues of IG-predators. This might weaken the strength of IG-predation, possibly providing more opportunities for IG-prey and IG-predators to co-exist.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1605-5 |
| Downloads |
2010_CHOHetal_Oecologia.pdf
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
