The Real (New) Deal: Levelling the Odds for Consumer-Litigants On the Need for a Modernization, Part II
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2019 |
| Journal | European Review of Private Law |
| Volume | Issue number | 27 | 6 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1227-1249 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
With its New Deal proposals, the European Commission aimed to secure that
all consumers ‘fully benefit from their rights under Union law’. We argue that such commitment requires taking a step back from an exclusive focus on enforcement, to tackle challenges to the justiciability of consumer rights. Consumers must be seen both in their role as claimants and when they act as defendants. By means of a case-study threading together the main developments in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning procedural guarantees for consumers from the past year, we seek to highlight the shortcomings of the current reliance on ‘judicial harmonization’. The identified shortcomings, we claim, show that limited harmonization of civil procedure is required, with regard to establishing minimum protective standards in cases involving consumers. For interested readers, we also list a number of specific issues that we think such harmonization should engage with. |
| Document type | Article |
| Note | © 2019 Kluwer Law International B.V., a Wolters Kluwer Company. All rights reserved. |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/European%20Review%20of%20Private%20Law/27.6/40769 |
| Downloads |
ERPL2019069
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
