International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress

Open Access
Authors
  • A.G. Glaros
  • T. Kato
  • V. Santiago
  • E. Winocur
  • A. De Laat
  • R. De Leeuw
  • K. Koyano
  • G.J. Lavigne
  • P. Svensson
  • D. Manfredini
Publication date 11-2018
Journal Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Volume | Issue number 45 | 11
Pages (from-to) 837-844
Organisations
  • Faculty of Dentistry (ACTA)
Abstract

In 2013, consensus was obtained on a definition of bruxism as repetitive masticatory muscle activity characterised by clenching or grinding of the teeth and/or by bracing or thrusting of the mandible and specified as either sleep bruxism or awake bruxism. In addition, a grading system was proposed to determine the likelihood that a certain assessment of bruxism actually yields a valid outcome. This study discusses the need for an updated consensus and has the following aims: (i) to further clarify the 2013 definition and to develop separate definitions for sleep and awake bruxism; (ii) to determine whether bruxism is a disorder rather than a behaviour that can be a risk factor for certain clinical conditions; (iii) to re-examine the 2013 grading system; and (iv) to develop a research agenda. It was concluded that: (i) sleep and awake bruxism are masticatory muscle activities that occur during sleep (characterised as rhythmic or non-rhythmic) and wakefulness (characterised by repetitive or sustained tooth contact and/or by bracing or thrusting of the mandible), respectively; (ii) in otherwise healthy individuals, bruxism should not be considered as a disorder, but rather as a behaviour that can be a risk (and/or protective) factor for certain clinical consequences; (iii) both non-instrumental approaches (notably self-report) and instrumental approaches (notably electromyography) can be employed to assess bruxism; and (iv) standard cut-off points for establishing the presence or absence of bruxism should not be used in otherwise healthy individuals; rather, bruxism-related masticatory muscle activities should be assessed in the behaviour's continuum.

Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12663
Other links https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85051513285
Downloads
Permalink to this page
Back