What is needed to implement a web-based audit and feedback intervention with outreach visits to improve care quality A concept mapping study among cardiac rehabilitation teams

Authors
  • T. Vromen
  • M.W.M. Jaspers
  • N.F. de Keizer
Publication date 01-2017
Journal International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume | Issue number 97
Pages (from-to) 76-85
Number of pages 10
Organisations
  • Faculty of Law (FdR) - Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS)
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Evidence on successful quality improvement (QI) in health care requires quantitative information from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of QI interventions, but also qualitative information from professionals to understand factors influencing QI implementation.

OBJECTIVE: Using a structured qualitative approach, concept mapping, this study determines factors identified by cardiac rehabilitation (CR) teams on what is needed to successfully implement a web-based audit and feedback (A&F) intervention with outreach visits to improve the quality of CR care.

METHODS: Participants included 49 CR professionals from 18 Dutch CR centres who had worked with the A&F system during a RCT. In three focus group sessions participants formulated statements on factors needed to implement QI successfully. Subsequently, participants rated all statements for importance and feasibility and grouped them thematically. Multi dimensional scaling was used to produce a final concept map.

RESULTS: Forty-two unique statements were formulated and grouped into five thematic clusters in the concept map. The cluster with the highest importance was QI team commitment, followed by organisational readiness, presence of an adequate A&F system, access to an external quality assessor, and future use and functionalities of the A&F system.

CONCLUSION: Concept mapping appeared efficient and useful to understand contextual factors influencing QI implementation as perceived by healthcare teams. While presence of a web-based A&F system and external quality assessor were seen as instrumental for gaining insight into performance and formulating QI actions, QI team commitment and organisational readiness were perceived as essential to actually implement and carry out these actions. These two sociotechnical factors should be taken into account when implementing and evaluating the success of QI implementations in future research.

Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.003
Permalink to this page
Back