Interpretation of differential item functioning analyses using external review

Authors
  • A. de Graeff
  • M. Groenvold
  • C. Gundy
  • M. Koller
  • M.A. Petersen
  • M.A.G. Sprangers
Publication date 2010
Journal Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research
Volume | Issue number 10 | 3
Pages (from-to) 253-258
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
  • Faculty of Medicine (AMC-UvA)
Abstract
Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses are used to determine whether certain groups respond differently to a particular item of a test or questionnaire; however, these do not explain the reasons for observed response differences. Many studies have used external reviews of items, sometimes using blinded reviewers, to help interpret these results. The authors conducted a literature review of this topic to describe the current usage of external reviews alongside DIF analyses. It concentrated on studies of health-related quality of life instruments, but studies in other fields were also considered. Relatively few examples of blinded item reviews were identified, and these were mostly from educational studies. A case study using blinded bilingual reviewers alongside translation DIF analyses of a health-related quality of life instrument is described. Future researchers should consider conducting external item reviews alongside DIF analyses
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.10.22
Permalink to this page
Back