Social Media Research after the Fake News Debacle

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2018
Journal Partecipazione e Conflitto
Volume | Issue number 11 | 2
Pages (from-to) 557-570
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis (ASCA)
Abstract
Social media data as source for empirical studies have recently come under renewed scrutiny, given the widespread deletion of Russian disinformation pages by Facebook as well as the suspension of Alt Right accounts by Twitter. Missing data is one issue, compounded by the fact that the ‘archives’ (CrowdTangle for Facebook and Gnip for Twitter) are also owned by the companies. Previously questions revolved around the extent to which corporate data collected for one purpose (e.g., advertising) could be em-ployed by social science for another (e.g., political engagement). Social media data also could be said to be far from ‘good data’, since the platforms not only change and introduce new data fields (‘reactions’ on Facebook), but also increasingly narrow what is available to researchers for privacy reasons. Profound ethical issues were also put on display recently during the Cambridge Analytica scandal, as science became implicated in the subsequent ‘locking down' of social media data by the corporations. How to approach social media data these days?
Document type Article
Note In Special Issue: From Big Data in Politics to the Politics of Big Data
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v11i2p557
Downloads
Rogers_PaCo_19556-126697-1-PB (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back