What's in a Trial? The Authors Respond: Persistent Mixing of Apples and Oranges, or Carefully Synthesizing and Designing the Next Steps in Research on Cognitive Bias Modification in Addiction
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | May 2018 |
| Journal | Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs |
| Volume | Issue number | 79 | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 348-349 |
| Organisations |
|
| Document type | Comment/Letter to the editor |
| Note | Reply to: I.A. Cristea, R.N. Kok, P. Cuijpers (2018) Persistent double standards in evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive bias modification: A commentary on Wiers et al. (2018). In: Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Vol. 79, iss. 3, May 2018, pp. 344–345 |
| Language | English |
| Related publication | What's in a Trial? On the Importance of Distinguishing Between Experimental Lab Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials: The Case of Cognitive Bias Modification and Alcohol Use Disorders |
| Published at |
https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2018.79.348
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
