Comparative Cognition Needs Big Team Science: How Large-Scale Collaborations Will Unlock the Future of the Field

Open Access
Authors
  • N. Alessandroni
  • D. Altschul
  • M. Bazhydai
  • K. Byers-Heinlein
  • M. Elsherif
  • B. Gjoneska
  • L. Huber
  • V. Mazza
  • R. Miller
  • C. Nawroth
  • E. Pronizius
  • M.A.J. Qadri
  • V. Šlipogor
  • M. Soderstrom
  • J.R. Stevens
  • I. Visser ORCID logo
  • M. Williams
  • M. Zettersten
  • L. Prétôt
Publication date 2024
Journal Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews
Volume | Issue number 19
Pages (from-to) 67-72
Number of pages 6
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract

Comparative cognition research has been largely constrained to isolated facilities, small teams, and a limited number of species. This has led to challenges such as conflicting conceptual definitions and underpowered designs. Here, we explore how Big Team Science (BTS) may remedy these issues. Specifically, we identify and describe four key BTS advantages — increasing sample size and diversity, enhancing task design, advancing theories, and improving welfare and conservation efforts. We conclude that BTS represents a transformative shift capable of advancing research in the field.

Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.3819/CCBR.2024.190001
Other links https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85193370695
Downloads
CCBR-vol19-pp067-072-Alessandroni (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back