A Commentary on “Developments in the Rorschach Assessment of Disordered Thinking and Communication” (Kleiger & Mihura, 2021)
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2021 |
| Journal | Rorschachiana |
| Volume | Issue number | 42 | 2 |
| Pages (from-to) | 281-288 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
“Why on earth would one use the Rorschach to assess disordered thinking?” was
the almost Pavlovian reaction of the second author to the request to write this commentary. This uninformed response was markedly changed after reading the excellent contribution by Kleiger and Mihura (2021), as well as the research they cite. The authors convincingly argue for the reliability and validity of a set of Rorschach scales that assess thought disorder. Hence, we see no reason why one shouldn’t use these scales for this purpose. Apart from reliability and validity, the question “why use the Rorschach?” encompasses utility. This deserves attention if one wishes to convince new researchers and clinicians to start using the instrument. We will review current instruments for disordered thinking and communication and discuss the hypothet- ical (incremental) utility of the Rorschach in research and in clinical practice |
| Document type | Comment/Letter to the editor |
| Note | In special issue: The Rorschach Test Today: An Update on the Research. - Comment on: J.H. Kleiger, J.L. Mihura, (2021) Developments in the Rorschach assessment of disordered thinking and communication. Rorschachiana, 42(2), 265–280. |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604/a000145 |
| Published at | https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=01429396-202142020-00013&LSLINK=80&D=ovft |
| Permalink to this page | |