Kant's logic revisited
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 05-2017 |
| Journal | The IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications |
| Volume | Issue number | 4 | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 845-865 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Kant considers his Critique of Pure Reason to be founded on the act of judging and the different forms of judgement, hence, take pride of place in his argumentation. The consensus view is that this aspect of the Critique of Pure Reason is a failure because Kant’s logic is far too weak to bear such a weight. Here we show that the consensus view is mistaken and that Kant’s logic should be identified with geometric logic, a fragment of intuitionistic logic of great foundational significance. |
| Document type | Article |
| Note | In: Special issue dedicated to the memory of Grigory Mints |
| Language | English |
| Published at | http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/ifcolog/?00013 |
| Downloads |
Kants logic revisited
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |