Scratching the surface: The dramaturgical oxymoron in Beckett's silences
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2021 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Beckett's Voices/Voicing Beckett |
| ISBN |
|
| ISBN (electronic) |
|
| Series | Themes in theatre |
| Pages (from-to) | 85-96 |
| Publisher | Leiden: Brill |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Despite — or maybe because of — the insisting preoccupation with silence
in Beckett’s work, it is a state that seems hard to reach. Noise is
continuously interfering in one way or another. Introducing the notion
of the ‘dramaturgical oxymoron’ that opens up a gap between two
different modes of narration, this essay will argue that Beckett’s plays
demonstrate the impossibility of ultimate silence, which lies outside
the symbolic order. In this sense these background noises are similar to
other disruptive signs, such as the scratch, which is a recurring motif
in Beckett. What may seem a mere detail in Krapp’s Last Tape, a
scratch on the girl’s thigh, inflicted by picking gooseberries, serves
as a metaphor for the loss of completeness and one’s alienation from the
world. In the voice, finally, the character is disembodied,
virtualised. Existing of nothing but thin air, in Mouth’s ‘own’ words in
Not I, the voice does not seem to belong to the body and gives rise to the alienating effect of what Derrida calls s’entendre parler.
Although the French deconstructionist has never written on Beckett, his
writings on the primacy of the voice and the opposing stance he
distinguishes in Artaud probably say as much about Beckett.
|
| Document type | Chapter |
| Language | English |
| Published at |
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004468382_008
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |